Monday, 10/3/11

BEQ 5:30 
NYT 4:16 (pannonica) 
LAT 2:54 
CS 5:52 (Sam) 

Stanley Newman’s New York Times crossword — pannonica’s review

NYT crossword 10/3/11 • Newman • 100311 • answers

This puzzle’s theme is the old vowel progression standby. Today it’s dressed up in phonic garb, as the final syllable of each entry, with a ‘W’ sound, or a DUBYA (66a), in front.

  • 17a. [Wins a dispute] GETS ONE’S WAY.
  • 26a. [Pompous pronoun] THE ROYAL ‘WE’.
  • 37a. ["It's a mystery to me"] I CAN’T TELL YOU WHY.
  • 50a. [Sob stories] TALES OF WOE.
  • 59a. [In romantic pursuit] PITCHING WOO.

That’s A, E, I, O, U. Why no wye? Because, although sometimes it’s a vowel, its name always rhymes with I, aye. So a sixth theme entry in this puzzle would be redundant. The /’u:/ pronunciation of the vowel in WOO comprises a discrepant variation on the twenty-first letter, the standard pronunciation being /’ju:/, so I’ll call the entry questionable at best (not that I can think of a suitable substitute). It isn’t a compromise I’d be willing to make, and this would be another theme I’d abandon.

By the way, please notice that I didn’t include a link to the Eagles song with the same title as 37-across. You’re welcome.

The ballast fill is smooth, but feels burdened with an excess of acronyms, or more accurately, initialisms. In fact, three of them (two plurals!) are piled up together in the northeast: ETA, MDS, CPAS.

Other observations:

  • Long non-theme fill includes USA TODAY and TRIOXIDE. Interesting middle length entries include vertical stacks TEMPLE/AT DAWN/BASSET and STOLID/CAVERN/ALASKA.
  • NINJA crosses JESUS in the northwest.  Hai! What, no zombie?
  • FIT UP as the verb [Equip] seems a bit obscure for a Monday puzzle. Themer PITCHING WOO seems a bit antiquated, but there’s ample Googlevidence for its current USAGE (43a).
  • 55a. If you’re going to stoop to using Roman numerals in a puzzle, don’t mess around with calculations or historical dates, just lay it out like this, [Numeral at the top of a grandfather clock] XIII.

Good crossword for a Monday, but I wouldn’t give it an A-PLUS (6a).

Updated Monday morning:

Donna S. Levin’s CrosSynergy/Washington Post crossword, “Realty Reality Check” – Sam Donaldson’s review

CrosSynergy / Washington Post crossword solution October 3

Rats! I’ve been concocting a crossword with this very theme off-an-on for a while now. It’s not the first time I’ve been beaten to the punch, but it always feels like a small kick in the shins. Oh well. I guess I should look at it as though I have just saved a bunch of time.

I suppose it’s no surprise that I like the theme. Levin gets to the real meaning of some common expressions used in real estate ads:

  • 17-Across: [If the ad says "cozy," it means] TOO TINY FOR WORDS. Wow, not even words can fit inside?
  • 25-Across: [If the ad says "quaint charm," it means] NEEDS RENOVATION. I always thought the need for renovation was conveyed through terms like “looking for TLC,” “great for the DIY couple,” and “fixer.”  To my ear, “quaint charm” means more like “old with a quirky layout or interior design.”
  • 43-Across: [If the ad says "centrally located," it means] NOISY ALL THE TIME. That sounds about right.
  • 57-Across: [If the ad says "the best of the best," it means] YOU CAN’T AFFORD IT. Amen, sister.

Part of the reason I worked on this theme idea only intermittently is because I’m not sure of the best way to present the punchlines.  I really admire Levin’s effort, but I’m unsure whether expressions like “TOO TINY FOR WORDS” or “NOISY ALL THE TIME” are sufficiently “in-the-language” to work as the theme entries.  Perhaps it would work better if the ad-speak was in the answers, like maybe using the clue ["It's so small your furniture won't fit," in real estate ad-speak] for something like COZY DWELLING. (COZY probably can’t be a theme entry by itself because it’s too short.)  You see the problem.  Ultimately, I think Levin may have pulled it off as well as it can be done.

Highlights in the fill include IN CARE OF, NO FUN, EEYORE, C-SPAN, GEICO, and HOOFER, the [Dancer, in theaterspeak]. Strange to see both OPAL, the [October birthstone], and OPEL, the [German car make] in the grid. I think my word of the day will be [Bishoprics], the clue for DIOCESES. Sounds like one is referring to two bishops named Rick, right?

Janie Smulyan’s Los Angeles Times crossword

LA Times crossword answers, 10 3 11

I had Frosted Flakes for breakfast this morning but I should’ve had the Rice Krispies instead of just looking at the box. Today’s theme is SNAP, CRACKLE AND POP, the Rice Krispies elves:

  • 17a. ["Get a grip!"] clues the snappy “SNAP OUT OF IT!”
  • 37a. CRACKLE FINISH is a [Crafts technique for an old-fashioned look]. It’s also the finish on my husband’s new 50-year-old Gibson Melody Maker, but it comes by the crackling honestly.
  • 60a. [Connector that completes a phrase made from the starts of the three longest across answers] is AND, and it aptly appears right before the final entry in the series.
  • 61a. To POP A WHEELIE is to [Get the front of one's bike off the ground]. We just had a portion of this answer the other week in another puzzle; might’ve been POPA. The full phrase is, of course, best.

Highlights include the longer morsels like LEAP YEAR, HECKLE, a sarcastic BIG WOW, and MUDDLE. I filled in TAPAS for 4d: [Noshes in Nuevo Laredo] and was glad when the crossings worked out because I also considered TACOS, but then the TACOS showed up later as 35a: [Folded Mexican snacks]. I’m enjoying the veggie tacos at a new neighborhood joint that specializes in Mediterrannean and Mexican food (separate but equal, not fusion cuisine). I suspect the restaurateur wanted to serve falafel and shawarma and the like, but decided the hedge his bets by selling tacos and burritos too. Gotta love the “we have two distinct cuisines from different continents” restaurants.

Less fond of fill like ENA and OPAH (“Uma, Oprah. Oprah, Uma.”), DECA, A BELL, and French-on-a-Monday SALLE. And the corporate crossing between DOTCOM and clued-with-”telecomMCI was slightly jarring.

3.25 stars.

Brendan Quigley’s blog crossword, “Themeless Monday”

BEQ 372 solution

Hmph! 1-Across is WEBKINZ, not NEOPETS? I don’t pay attention to the kid crazes that my own kid has no use for, and Neopets were fresh in my mind because when you start to Google my friend Patrice’s book, Negropedia, the first six letters make Google think you’re interested in necrophilia, necropsy, and perhaps necrophagia (!). Add the seventh letter and Google’s pretty sure you are all about the Neopets but really can’t spell.

8-Across is WAR PIGS? Don’t know it.

The WASABI really goes better with KARAOKE BARS than the KRAFT CHEESE does, don’t you think? I love a good BEAR PIT (though the term doesn’t ring a bell) since I tried to sneak into one when I was a toddler. Alas, I didn’t even make it to the moat before some dude fetched me and handed me back to my mother.

I’m not feeling very focused right now, at least not focused on this puzzle. (This bodes unwell for that stack of crosswords that await me and wish to be edited.) Smooth fill, four stars.

This entry was posted in Daily Puzzles and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Monday, 10/3/11

  1. Gareth says:

    Curious that Stanley Newman chose to publish this in the NYT. He publishes many of his puzzles (under pseudonyms) in his own Creators Syndicate, and this would have fit right in… I had no idea what PITCHINGWOO is or how one would use it in a sentence, that’s more or less what pushed my time to Tuesday territory! I notice all the top google hits are dictionary sites, that’s usually a sign something’s not au courant! I’d say the theme is consistent if you consider the 5 as long >VOWEL< sound: DATE, DEKE, DIRE, DOTE, DUKE.

  2. pannonica says:

    That’s a very good point about the long vowel sounds, Gareth. I hadn’t thought along that line.

  3. Will Nediger says:

    But the DATE, DEKE, DIKE, DOTE, DUKE sequence seems more natural to me. I guess either way works fine, since the only difference between the vowels in DIKE and DIRE is the height of the first part of the diphthong. On the other hand, if you’re going to go for a phonetic progression, you might as well do something like BAA, BAY, BEE, BOW, BOO.

  4. Howard B says:

    Well, it seemed like a cute Monday with some nice, mostly accessible theme answers with some pop (HGTV, YER OUT!, etc). And really, that’s what you’re looking for this early in the week. Something you can finish and feel good about if you’re newer at this or not as comfortable with the later-week puzzles, or to ease into the week if you like the tougher stuff.

    Speaking of Pop, yay to Janie on her LA Times :).

  5. Martin says:

    Gareth,

    “Pitching woo” is probably an Americanism, as well as being a tad hoary. But it’s not really obscure to American ears, in my opinion. Strangely, “pitch a little woo” yields mostly “real” citations.

  6. janie says:

    thx for the shout out, howard — nice to be back! ;-)

    as for “woo pitching”: this is when i’m reminded of the lyrics from “too darn hot” (kiss me, kate/cole porter>. specifically, that’d be:

    PAUL:
    I’d like to coo to my baby tonight,
    And pitch the woo with my baby tonight.

    PAUL AND BOYS:
    I’d like to coo to my baby tonight,
    And pitch the woo with my baby tonight.

    PAUL:
    But, pillow, you’ll be my baby tonight,
    ‘Cause it’s too darn hot.

    stay cool, all!

    ;-)

  7. lexicon fan says:

    WOO-HOO!!! (You know what I’m talking about!)

  8. Mitchs says:

    Good luck Joon. I’m hoping the previous comment signifies your victory! Starts a half hour from now in Cincinnati.

  9. Mitchs says:

    Well, now if Gaffney can fashion a meta that reveals Fort Sumter…I’ll not know it twice.

  10. John says:

    In the LA Times puzzle, LEAP YEAR is nice fill, but its clue is terrible. For one thing, [When presidential elections occur] would seem to call for a plural answer, but worse than that, it’s factually incorrect. Generally speaking, leap years occur in years that are evenly divisible by four. However, years that are evenly divisible by 100 are generally NOT leap years, unless also evenly divisible by 400. So while 2000 was a leap year, 1800 and 1900 were not, and as Thomas Jefferson and William McKinley can tell you, there were definitely US presidential elections those years.

Comments are closed.